邓丽君被成龙玩死内幕 内容太惊人

不丹文章《印度洞郎入侵的背后:肮脏的一面》

T 大字体2017-08-12 09:48:46 五毛网

1、“依2007年印度不丹友好条约,印度保障不丹的国家安全。”

2、“不丹允许印度(军队)进入它的领土。”现在大家应该明白为何印度先说他们“被不丹军方请求(支援)”,然后改称“行动为配合不丹军方”。

来源:龙腾网 整理:五毛网 http://www.wumaow.com

本博客作者Wangcha Sangey是位不丹人。常年从不丹人的观点写博。

On 29th July 2017, an article on Doklam Standoff was published in OneIndia News. The writer Vicky Nanjappa a senior Correspondent quoting " highly placed sources" wrote.

OneIndia News于2017年7月29日发表一篇关于洞郎僵局的文章。资深记者Vicky Nanjappa引述“高层来源”写道:

To quote :

(以下有冒号的都是本文作者引述Vicky Nanjappa在OneIndia News发表的文章,下面是本文作者的反驳。)

1. " For Bhutan, India guarantees its security through the 2007 Friendship Treaty."

1、“依2007年印度不丹友好条约,印度保障不丹的国家安全。”

This statement is a reiteration of the recent Indian Government stand that Bhutan is a " Protectorate state " of India.

Not at all acceptable to Bhutan and far from ground realities.

这陈述是在重复近来印度政府关于不丹是印度“保护国”的立场。这对不丹而言是完全不可接受的,也是远远不符合事实的。

2 " Bhutan has allowed access to Indians on its territory."

2、“不丹允许印度(军队)进入它的领土。”

This statement alludes to the forceful encampment of Indian troops on the Bhutanese side of disputed Doklam Plateau after confrontation with Chinese construction party.

这陈述指向印度部队在和中国建筑方冲突后,强行宿营在有争议的洞郎高原不丹方。

Now one can understand why India claimed first that they " were requested by Bhutan Army"  and later changed to " in coordination with Bhutan Army " and possibly after my blog which rubbished such ludicrous claims, India declared that they were " protecting the security of their so called chicken neck". India has no right of whatsoever to station Indian Army combat troops on Bhutanese side of Doklam or the disputed area.

现在大家应该明白为何印度先说他们“被不丹军方请求(支援)”,然后改称“行动为配合不丹军方”。然后在我博客(本作者的其他文章)指出印度荒唐行为后,印度又宣称他们在“保护印度鸡脖子(西里古里走廊)的安全。印度没有任何权利在不丹边的洞郎或争议地置军。

Actually India's real goal was to engulf  Bhutan because they used the Doklam intrusion to declare:

印度真正的目的是吞食不丹,因为他们以干涉洞郎事件为借口来宣称:

1. That Bhutan is a " Indian protectorate state ." That's what India said of Sikkim before submerging her.

1、不丹是印度的“受保护国”(印度是不丹的宗主国)。印度在并吞锡金以前也做过此事。

2. India chose to brandish the 1949 Indo- Bhutan Treaty wherein it was stated that Bhutan's foreign affairs was to be guided by India. That clause was removed in the 2007 revised 1949 Indo- Bhutan Treaty. Bhutan opted to conduct her foreign affairs independently and had never sought Indian guidance.  However, this time during Doklam crisis, India refused to recognise Bhutan' s right to her own independent foreign policy.

2、印度选择性地指出1949年印度不丹条约里写着不丹外交事务归印度管理。然而,那条款已经在2007年新修订的印度不丹条约里去除了。不丹选择了独立自主的外交政策,并不曾寻求印度的指导。但是,在本次洞郎事件里,印度不承认不丹外交政策的主权

3. India made claims about a "security pact" with Bhutan.There is no such pact. Nothing in the knowledge of the Bhutanese Parliament or the people.

3、印度宣称与不丹有“安全协议”。这是子虚乌有的。不丹国会和人民不知悉有此协议。

The Royal Bhutan Government or the Royal Bhutan Army whose Supreme Commander is His Majesty the King would never have agreed to India's interference  into the Bhutan- China Border Talks especially by use of military force. Bhutan is a small nation. We have to find peaceful means. Involving Indian Government or Indian Army is the shortest route to national suicide.

不丹王家政府或不丹王家军队的最高统帅,不丹国王陛下不会同意印度介入不丹-中国边界谈判,尤其是涉及动用武力。不丹是个小国。我们只能依靠和平手段。让印度政府或印度军队介入对于不丹而言是自杀。

Let me relate following historical decisions of the Kings of Bhutan to demonstrate how wary Bhutan had always been of silent takeover by the  powerful neighbourly friend called India.

让我回顾以下历代不丹国王在关键时候的决定,来说明我们对强大邻居朋友印度的蚕食有多担心。

1. In 1962 during Sino- India war, the 3rd King of Bhutan granted safe passage to Indian soldiers fleeing Arunachal through Eastern Bhutan to India only after the soldiers surrendered their rifles at Tashigang Dzong. This demonstrates that Bhutan does not welcome armed combat troops even that of India. .

1、在1962年中印战争期间,不丹国王三世要求从东不丹方向逃离藏南地区回印度的印度士兵,必须先在Tashigang Dzong缴械。这显示不丹国不欢迎武装战斗部队入境,就算是印度的也一样。

2. In 2003, India offered combat troops to Bhutan to fight Indian militant groups.  There is already IMTRAT the training wing of Indian Army in Bhutan.They are supposed to be unarmed and therefore, not in the category of regular fighting force.

2、在2003年的时候,印度表示愿意提供战斗部队来帮助不丹对抗印度武装组织。这仅仅是IMTRAT,印度陆军在不丹的训练支队。理论上,他们并没有携带武器,所以不算常备战斗部队。

His Majesty the 4th King was not sure whether his own force could expel the militant groups. After all, the greater numbered militants were also battle hardened and well armed.  But His Majesty was sure of one reality. That was if he accepted combat troops of Indian Army into the Kingdom, that would be the end of sovereign Bhutan. So the King took the less evil option. The offer of Indian Army was declined. And His Majesty decided to lead in person the Royal Bhutan Army to expel the various groups  like ULFA ,  BODO and  KLO Indian militants camped in the thick jungles of Southern Bhutan.

精彩推荐

2小时前

分享:

全部评论

网友热评

登录/注册后发表评论

发表评论

应用推荐

战略军事

下载

军情速览

下载

军林秘史

下载

我的路

下载

探索世界

下载